The traditional approach to strength training for endurance athletes has been to focus on a high number of repetitions with relatively light weights – three sets of 10 to 15 reps for each exercise, for example. The idea is to build strength without packing on too much muscle, a “problem” that is purely hypothetical for the vast majority of people.
Instead, it turns out that the exact opposite approach may produce better results. Training with heavy weights or explosive motions, such as leaping, seems to have less in common with the demands of running, but these techniques are extremely effective at improving the communication between your brain and your muscles.
Such “neuromuscular” adaptations allow you to recruit more muscle fibres with each contraction, and ultimately translate into more efficient running.
Researchers at the University of Rome tested this idea in a study published in this month’s issue of The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. They recruited 16 runners, with an average age of 44 who were preparing for a marathon, and divided them into three groups. In addition to their regular running, one group added a six-week, twice-weekly traditional strength-training program consisting of three sets of 10 reps of a variety of upper- and lower-body exercises, using a weight equal to about 70 per cent of their one-rep max. The second group did a heavy-weight protocol, doing four sets of three to four reps with 85 to 90 per cent of one-rep max. The third group did no weights.
After six weeks, only the heavy-weights group had made any improvements: 16 per cent in their one-rep max on the leg-press machine and 6 per cent in running economy. Interestingly, these gains came without any significant increase in muscle mass, supporting the hypothesis that the primary benefits were neuromuscular.
Another study, due to be published later this year in the same journal, found that runners can also benefit from “plyometric” training, which uses explosive leaps and jumps to stimulate neuromuscular pathways. Researchers in Chile and Spain assigned 36 runners to either a six-week plyometric training program (60 drop jumps twice a week) or a control group; by the end of the study, the plyometric group had improved their time in a 2.4-kilometre run by 3.9 per cent, while also improving sprint and jump performance.
While plyometrics are usually considered an advanced form of training, there’s no reason that recreational runners can’t use them too, as long as they build up gradually, says Dr. Mikel Izquierdo of the Public University of Navarra in Spain, the lead author of the study.
In fact, recreational runners may have even more to gain since they’re likely weaker to start, he says.
There’s still no getting away from the fact that the best way to get better at running is to run more. But these results suggest that even a short, six-week bout of strength training, inserted a few times a year leading up to a goal race, can give your running a significant jolt. It’s also a great way to build resistance to injuries and fight off the muscle loss associated with aging – and it’s a lot easier than running 300 kilometres a week.
A six-week strength-training routine
Dr. Maria Francesca Piacentini and her colleagues at the University of Rome used the following strength-training routine to boost running economy among master marathon runners: Lift twice-weekly for six weeks. Do four sets of three to four reps of each exercise: half-squat with arm weights, leg press, lunges with arm weights, bench press, lat pulldown (lift 85 to 90 per cent of your estimated one-rep max). Rest three to four minutes between reps.